Agricultural impact on soil organic carbon content: Testing the IPCC carbon accounting method for evaluations at county scale

Publicado en Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, v. 185:118–132

Villarino, S.H., Studdert, G.A., Laterra, P. and Cendoya, M.G.

Año de publicación 2014
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)
  • Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Unidad Integrada Balcarce, Argentina




Proyecto CRN3095


•We developed a Tier 2 of IPCC carbon accounting method.

•We compared Tier 1 and Tier 2 performances.

•Our approach overcame several conceptual limitations of the default method.

•Our estimations with Tier 2 method fitted acceptably well against empirical data.


Soil organic carbon (SOC) plays a vital role in determining soil quality and health, but also SOC decrease contributes significantly to the increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration. Countries need to quantify their SOC stocks and flows in order to assess their greenhouse gas emissions. To facilitate this, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has developed a simple carbon accounting method to estimate SOC stocks and flows in response to changes in land use. This method proposes three tiers for SOC change estimation. The higher the tier the greater the accuracy of the estimates, but also the complexity and the need of information. We used the RothC model to derive SOC change factors in order to develop a Tier 2 (T2) method. We applied this T2 and Tier 1 (T1) methods to estimate SOC stocks and flows in five sub regions of the Argentinean Pampa Region between 1900 and 2006. We evaluated T1 and T2 methods performances comparing their estimates against empirical data, at sub region and county scales. At both spatial scales, T1 method showed a poor performance and an important improvement was achieved with T2 method, although its performance varied among spatial scales. At sub region scale, T2 method estimates were very good (R2 = 0.85), but at county scale the fit was poor (R2 = 0.46). However, this poor fit may have been due, at least in part, to the quality of the input and validation information of one of the sub regions (Flooding Pampa) since its exclusion of the analysis led to an increase of the R2 up to 0.73. Tier 2 was used to estimate the impact of land use change on SOC. Sub regions with the highest estimated SOC losses were Central Pampa, Southern Pampa &ndash Eastern and Rolling Pampa, with 35%, 28% and 26% average SOC losses, respectively. Given that several conceptual limitations of T1 method were overcome with our simple T2 method, we conclude that T2 method is more realistic to conduct a regional SOC inventory. Besides, our T2 method was developed without using empirical information from field or laboratory studies about SOC change and, therefore, countries that have not enough empirical information available on SOC change associated to land use could derive a similar T2 method.